Strikes on Syria look more like practice than punishment
Moscow and Washington are putting the best possible spin on the results of airstrikes on Syria, each seeking to be seen as the victor.
![MIDEAST-CRISIS/SYRIA A U.S. Air Force B-1B Lancer bomber, being deployed to launch strikes as part of the multinational response to Syria's use of chemical weapons, is refuelled by a KC-135 tanker aircraft over an undisclosed location, April 14, 2018. U.S. Air Force/Handout via REUTERS. ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY - RC1C9014E3B0](/sites/default/files/styles/article_hero_medium/public/almpics/2018/04/RTX5PBLP.jpg/RTX5PBLP.jpg?h=a5ae579a&itok=Q7KdLngM)
The Syrian conflict is proof that in modern warfare, the perception of victory is sometimes more important than actual victory. The April 14 US-led strikes on Syria and subsequent challenges of their supposed effectiveness by Moscow and Damascus are aimed at helping both parties save face.
The attack came in retaliation for Syria’s alleged use of chemical weapons. The way the offensive was managed creates the impression that the event was staged, and it’s certainly not clear whether Russia and the United States succeeded in establishing a deterrence factor for the future.