Skip to main content

Why Egypt abstained from voting on UN sex crime resolution

Egypt believes a country could suffer far-reaching consequences under the UN resolution.

Women walk by a United Nations peacekeeping armoured vehicle guarding the outer perimeter of a compound of a school used as an electoral centre at the end of the presidential and legislative elections, in the mostly muslim PK5 neighbourhood of Bangui, Central African Republic, February 14, 2016. REUTERS/Siegfried Modola  - RTX26WL3
Women walk by a UN peacekeeping armored vehicle guarding the outer perimeter of a compound of a school in Bangui, Central African Republic, Feb. 14, 2016. — REUTERS/Siegfried Modola

Egypt’s UN ambassador Amr Abu Atta created quite a stir by abstaining during an otherwise unanimous vote to punish and repatriate UN peacekeeping battalions that include personnel suspected of sexual abuse in their assigned countries.

There’s a lot of speculation over why Abu Atta declined to vote March 11 on the US-drafted resolution before the UN Security Council. Some imply he simply chose to swim against the tide to become famous. But there are many alternative reasons.

Subscribe for unlimited access

All news, events, memos, reports, and analysis, and access all 10 of our newsletters. Learn more

$14 monthly or $100 annually ($8.33/month)
OR

Continue reading this article for free

All news, events, memos, reports, and analysis, and access all 10 of our newsletters. Learn more.

By signing up, you agree to Al-Monitor’s Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. Already have an account? Log in