Skip to main content

Did US backtrack on Palestinian statehood to please Israel?

The United States’ strong position against recognition of a Palestinian state has exposed the vacuity of its two-state rhetoric.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (front) talks with reporters aboard his government aircraft shortly after departing Seoul Air Base April 13, 2013, for Beijing, China. To rear of Kerry are Senior Staff members Glen Johnson (2nd R) and Jen Psaki (R)    REUETRS/Paul J. Richards/Pool (SOUTH KOREA - Tags: POLITICS) - RTXYJO9
US Secretary of State John Kerry (front) talks with reporters aboard his government aircraft shortly after departing Seoul Air Base for Beijing, China, April 13, 2013. Behind Kerry stand senior staff members Glen Johnson (2nd R) and Jen Psaki (R). — REUTERS/Paul J. Richards

The United States, which has progressively moved toward recognizing the State of Palestine, has suddenly backed away from even using the word Palestine. Were the previous positions merely lip service and are we now witnessing the true US position, or did the United States backtrack to please Israel?

A look at the history of US rhetorical interaction with the issue of Palestine shows progress over the past decades, from ignoring the existence of the Palestinian people to talking about Palestinian statehood.

Subscribe for unlimited access

All news, events, memos, reports, and analysis, and access all 10 of our newsletters. Learn more

$14 monthly or $100 annually ($8.33/month)
OR

Continue reading this article for free

All news, events, memos, reports, and analysis, and access all 10 of our newsletters. Learn more.

By signing up, you agree to Al-Monitor’s Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. Already have an account? Log in